Word on the web:  

It's official: f prot is the sh*t, f secure is the sh*t, avira is excellent, avg is superior, panda is first-class, nod32 is a good choice, avast is acceptable, bullguard is fair to middling, bitdefender is bogus, mcafee is a dud, esafe is like a bad smell, kasperky is lousy, not enough data for vba32.

Comparing avast vs avg vs avira vs bitdefender vs bullguard vs esafe vs f prot vs f secure vs kasperky vs mcafee vs nod32 vs panda vs vba32
 Negative
 Positive
 HipRank
f prot
 99%
f secure
 99%
avira
 94%
avg
 89%
panda
 82%
nod32
 71%
avast
 60%
bullguard
 54%
bitdefender
 38%
mcafee
 34%
esafe
 25%
kasperky
 18%
vba32
not enough data
Right on!  -  No way!  -  Email a Friend

Comments

On 20 August 2009 at 1:57 am boss said:
that is not true if you turn that table up-side down it is true.!!!!
On 12 September 2009 at 2:14 am andrew said:
yep =P right onnn GOOO F SECURE WOOOO
On 1 October 2009 at 8:35 am Keno said:
lOL taht's Not Right ...Avira 98% and Mcafe 96 %...u wrong
On 20 December 2009 at 12:19 pm Bruno said:
I am using F-Prot i hope is a good anti-virus My last one was AVG
On 10 February 2010 at 2:06 am symonds said:
I would rate Kaspersky at the top....
On 1 March 2010 at 6:32 pm JD said:
Kaspersky is really good but the trojan detection on it sucks!
On 20 March 2010 at 9:32 pm Corigador said:
I tested all of the above, Best choice is Avira, if added ThreatFire as sidekick from PC Tools it is concrete. Worst choice is sadly Kaspearsky, right after Bull guard.

Post a comment

Name: Email: (Optional - not displayed to the public)
Comment