Which version of MS office has been compared, 2003 or 07?
On 4 April 2009 at 12:03 pm jick said:
I use Kingsoft Office now ,very easy for me!
On 22 April 2009 at 5:11 am Chris Leong said:
what about the freeware lotus symphony?
On 24 June 2009 at 4:30 am Anonymousisitity said:
what a bogus survey!!! every other survey on the net shows that msoffice and openoffice dominate all over koffice & staroffice
On 23 September 2009 at 11:17 am jc said:
these polls are made by unqualified jackasses withouth professional regard for a particular product.
On 21 November 2009 at 1:52 pm TamusJRoyce said:
Yes. StarOffice and KOffice do dominate the market. And the reason being is that Soooo many people use linux, and Ms Office and OpenOffice can't run on linux (with the exception of using wine, which is open source/free, to install Ms Office, or just installing the linux version of OpenOffice--but who's gonna do that).
According to my poll, only a few hundred people use windows. Thousands upon thousands of people use Linux (my best friend; my dog; my grandpa, who is now confused because I overwrote his OS with it)...
On 29 December 2009 at 4:20 pm me said:
jc: it's not a poll, this site just searches the internet and looks through the results to see what people are saying about the topics entered.
On 1 January 2010 at 3:16 pm uidsfhiuhds said:
@TamusJRoyce What? No one uses linux where I live. Most of the people never even heard about it. BTW, I agree with the hip ranks of every office suite mentioned. And you know what, openoffice is most of the linux OS' default office suite.
On 4 January 2010 at 3:34 am lopati said:
Me dog ate all my install cd's, except for FreeBSD which it lovingly installed for me. Yay. Looks like OpenOffice is the next download.
BTW anybody know how to cure linux? Dog's never recovered from that crapware and keeps shitting little redhats everywhere.
On 8 March 2010 at 1:51 pm Fascinated said:
I'm a huge fan of KOffice for their choices in diverging from the haphazard held-together-by-paperclips "system" of MS Office. They're really stepping out and saying "this is how an office suite should be programmed if we start with a 2010 base of expectations, technology and possibility." Which is all well and good, BUT... ... even I would readily admit it's not even close to comparable as an end-user solution. Even as a huge fan I only use it for about a quarter of what I hope I'd be able to. Honestly give it two years. The potential is absolutely there though and I'm glad it's got a positive spin on its development, but nobody could seriously begin to compare it on real-world usability yet.
