Word on the web:  

It's official: xkcd is relatively good, xkcd sucks should be trashed.

Comparing xkcd vs xkcd sucks
 Negative
 Positive
 HipRank
xkcd
 74%
xkcd sucks
 0%

Comments

On 10 August 2009 at 8:39 pm skhdbfksdkj said:
im a newf*g from yahoo whats "LOL" and i rhnk yahoo snwer and youtube and mys**ce and facebook are the best things in th univers i also dont know wat is emulator its a nerd type o thing and all the cool kdis at school aent doingi t so it is nto cool i m so know hwo to live
On 14 February 2010 at 4:10 pm Captain Cook said:
Sturgeon's Law Critic's Corollary: 90% of people lack the taste necessary to distinguish between crud and non-crud. --The Sturgeon Awards--
On 14 March 2010 at 11:33 am Rahul said:
How the f**k does being turd matter if people like it? I really don't get it, so 10% of the people get to decide what is non-turd and turd? Really?
On 7 June 2011 at 4:08 pm Aquarians Love To Fuck said:
I make my living o'er XKCDsucks - and they let me pixelate the word 'c**t' as often as I need to. Ease up on the denigration. Innit?
On 7 June 2011 at 10:31 pm Forevermore said:
xkcd is relatively good, relative to slitting a hole in a waterbed filled with vomit for use as a s*x toy.
On 26 February 2012 at 6:37 pm Jon Levi said:
Say what you like, but my only true friends are all in the xkcd sucks comment threads. And though I don't have the courage to say it there, I really do love you, Ravenzomg.

Post a comment

Name: Email: (Optional - not displayed to the public)
Comment